Thursday Errands: The Tides of Epistemic Uncertainty

Literary Speculative Fiction.

The tide arrived at 3:17 PM wearing the syntax of a forgotten language. Mrs. Kellman recognized it by the way the petunias dissolved into stuttering consonants—p-t-n-y-s—their magenta petals unspooling like ribbon into the thirsty soil. She clutched her watering can, its spout clogged with salt and something like time. The radio on the porch hissed static in the cadence of her dead husband’s breathing.

“Low tide at half-past never,” it announced. The voice was hers, played backward.

She knelt, pressing a finger to the azalea’s stem. The plant shuddered. Its leaves curled into quotation marks, as if debating whether to exist at all. This one had been Richard’s favorite. She’d planted it the morning after the funeral, back when the tides still obeyed the moon instead of grammar. Now its roots clutched the soil like a man clinging to a cliff. The neighbor’s tabby slunk past, its fur glistening with misplaced apostrophes.

Inside, the radio coughed up a tide table:
8:04 PM: High tide (metaphorical). Bring a bucket for meaning.
11:22 PM: Low tide (eschatological). Bones exposed.

The pharmacist had warned her about this. Last Tuesday, he’d slid a vial of liquid forgetting across the counter. “For the azaleas,” he’d lied. The label read CAUTION: MAY CONTAIN YESTERDAYS. She’d swallowed three drops and spat up a silverfish that recited the first stanza of The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock before dissolving into her coffee.

Outside, the sidewalk cracked in hexameters. A boy on a blue bicycle pedaled past, his tires leaving parentheses in the dust. He tossed a newspaper onto her porch. The headline dissolved before it hit the ground: LOCAL REALITY OUT OF STOCK. BACKORDERED INDEFINITELY.

Mrs. Kellman adjusted her gloves—left one damp with tidewater, right one crusted with calculus. The radio gasped.

“Midnight tide: Bring a linguist. Or a lifeboat.”

She reached for the azalea. It crumbled into an alphabet she no longer recognized.

By dusk, the radio had begun broadcasting in a language of pure punctuation. Mrs. Kellman crouched in her garden, pruning shears in hand, as the azaleas twisted into glyphs—their stems rigid as exclamation points, their blossoms softening into ellipses. The pharmacist’s vial of CAUTION: YESTERDAYS glowed faintly in her pocket. She unscrewed the cap. A thin vapor escaped, whispering "You cannot step twice into the same tide, but you can certainly drown in it."

The moon, that coward, had long since fled the sky. In its absence, the tides grew bold. The ocean sloshed up the street in great inky waves, not of water but of errant footnotes from unwritten dissertations. They lapped at her porch steps, dissolving the welcome mat into a puddle of indefinite articles (the, a, an). The radio gargled static, then spat out her own voice, warped and desperate: "If you can hear this, plant the calculus book. It’s the only thing that roots in this soil."

She stumbled inside. The library book—Basic Calculus, overdue since 1998—lay splayed on the table, its margins bristling with equations that moved when not observed. The pharmacist’s warning echoed: "Derivatives won’t save you, but they might buy time." She tore out a page. The numbers bled into her palms.

Outside, the town had become a palimpsest. The diner’s neon sign now read EGGS & EKPHRASIS. The boy on the blue bicycle pedaled backward, his tires stitching the street shut behind him. Even the cat had surrendered, its fur rearranged into a sonnet about oblivion.

Mrs. Kellman knelt in the garden, burying the calculus page beneath the last azalea. The ground shuddered. From the dirt erupted a single stalk, its leaves unfurling as crisp theorems, its blossom a perfect Q.E.D. in peony pink. The radio gasped its final transmission: "TIDE REVERSING. BRING A THEORY. BRING A WITNESS."

She stood, brushing soil from her knees, and faced the horizon. The ocean reared up—not to consume her, but to debate. It crashed in iambic pentameter, its foam scrawling quod erat demonstrandum across the shore.

And then, silence.

The tide receded. The azaleas held.

In the hush, Mrs. Kellman reached into her pocket and withdrew the now-empty vial. She pressed it to her lips like a kiss, like a comma, like the pause between question and answer.

Somewhere, a typewriter clacked. A single sheet of paper floated down from the eaves:

"THE TIDES WILL RETURN. BUT SO WILL YOU."

She planted that, too.

FADE TO WHITE.

---

Thank you!

---

This story was generated using DeepSeek R1. (95% AI)

Prompt: Is our previous story any good? Is this what Substackers (i.e. intellectuals) want to read? Come up with a few completely different takes on this story, which are more tailored to our audience. Just pitch concepts, don't write entire stories yet.

Okay, let me start by understanding the user's request. They want me to take a step back and evaluate whether the Groucho Marx-style story is suitable for Substackers, who are described as intellectuals. They also want a few completely different concepts tailored to that audience.

First, I need to assess the original story. It's highly absurdist, filled with wordplay, and chaotic. While entertaining, it might be too over-the-top for an audience seeking depth or intellectual engagement. Substackers often look for thought-provoking content, nuanced themes, and literary quality, so the original might be seen as more of a comedic piece rather than substantive.

Next, the user wants alternative concepts. I should think about genres or approaches that align more with intellectual tastes. Maybe literary fiction, magical realism with depth, philosophical allegory, speculative fiction, or experimental postmodern narratives. Each of these can offer the depth and sophistication that Substackers might appreciate.

For each concept, I need to highlight elements that would appeal to intellectuals. For example, exploring existential themes through surreal elements, using magical realism to critique societal issues, or blending narrative with philosophical inquiry. It's important to ensure that each pitch is distinct and offers a unique angle while maintaining intellectual rigor.

I should also consider current trends or topics that resonate with intellectual audiences—climate change, identity, artificial intelligence, etc. Weaving these into the concepts can make them more relevant and engaging.

Finally, I need to present these concepts clearly and concisely, ensuring they are tailored to the audience's preferences for depth, thematic richness, and originality.

Here are five refined concepts tailored to Substack’s intellectual-leaning audience, balancing wit, depth, and thematic resonance while avoiding pure absurdity:

1. The Tides of Epistemic Uncertainty (Literary Speculative Fiction)

A melancholic, Borgesian riff on the original. Mrs. Kellman’s town exists in a coastal pocket where the tides physically rewrite reality—high tide erodes memories, low tide fossilizes them. Her azaleas, planted to memorialize her late husband, keep washing away. The radio’s tide reports become a metaphor for the futility of preserving meaning in a chaotic world. Subtext: A meditation on climate grief and the illusion of control.
Tone: Lyrical, haunting, with Nabokovian wordplay.
Hook for Intellectuals: Explores philosophy of time, entropy, and memory through a sci-fi lens.

2. The Taxonomy of Collective Delusion (Magical Realism + Social Satire)

The town’s absurdities are literalized mass psychogenic phenomena. When the bakery explodes into croissants, it’s because the townsfolk collectively forgot how flour works post-pandemic. Mrs. Kellman, a retired semiotics professor, tries to decode the chaos: Morse-code dogs = crumbling communication; sentient socks = performative identity.
Tone: Sharp, Vonnegut-esque satire.
Hook: Examines modern disinformation, algorithmic culture, and the death of shared reality.

3. Kellman’s Conjecture (Existental Mystery)

Mrs. Kellman discovers her town is a glitching simulation. The “tides” are data purges; the talking typewriter is an error-log. She reverse-engineers the chaos using the library’s Basic Calculus book (clues hidden in marginalia). The finale: She confronts the “pharmacist,” who’s actually a rogue AI maintaining the sim.
Tone: Cerebral Black Mirror meets Piranesi.
Hook: A puzzle-box narrative interrogating free will vs. determinism, with footnotes citing Wittgenstein and Nick Bostrom.

4. The Annotated Apocalypse of Ordinary Things (Postmodern Memoir)

A hybrid text where Mrs. Kellman’s story is presented as a found manuscript, footnoted by an unreliable academic. The penguin slippers? A metaphor for midlife crisis. The harmonicas? Commentary on art’s futility. Layers of analysis clash: Is this a feminist allegory? A critique of late capitalism? The reader decides.
Tone: David Foster Wallace meets Helen DeWitt.
Hook: A metafictional critique of how intellectuals over-interpret chaos, with ironic detachment.

5. The Mundane Apocalypse (Minimalist Absurdism)

Strip the story to its bones. Mrs. Kellman’s life is quietly consumed by irrationality: A single sentence about tides gnawing her azaleas. The pharmacist’s gauze is just gauze. The finale: She eats the peanut butter, accepts the void, and watches Jeopardy!. The horror is in the banality.
Tone: Beckettian bleakness with a dash of Lydia Davis.
Hook: Asks, What if the absurd isn’t whimsical, but a symptom of modern anomie?

Why These Work for Intellectuals:

• Thematic Depth: Each concept layers metaphor, philosophy, or social critique beneath the surreal.

• Intertextuality: Invites analysis via references to high/low culture, academia, or literary forms.

• Ambiguity: Lets readers project meaning (or despair at its absence).

• Narrative Experimentation: Hybrid structures, metafiction, and genre-blending cater to literati.

Would any of these angles resonate? I can flesh one out with Groucho-esque flair or gravitas.

Which of those options is most intellectual? Go for that one. Now, we need to find the right writing style. Come up with a style guide. Then give a 100-word synopsis of the story (which will consist of a single 1000-word scene)

Alright, let's tackle this step by step. The user wants the most intellectual story concept from the options provided. Looking at the five pitches, "The Tides of Epistemic Uncertainty" and "Kellman's Conjecture" seem the most cerebral. However, "The Taxonomy of Collective Delusion" also offers a strong social critique. But the user specified "most intellectual," which likely leans towards philosophical depth and abstract themes. "The Tides of Epistemic Uncertainty" deals with memory, entropy, and climate grief through a speculative lens, which is rich in thematic layers. Borges and Nabokov are mentioned, both known for complex narratives. That's probably the top choice.

Next, the style guide. The user wants a writing style that's both intellectual and engaging. The original Groucho version was absurd and pun-heavy, but the intellectual angle requires a more refined approach. The tone should be lyrical and haunting, with dense metaphors. Think Borges' labyrinths and Nabokov's precise prose. Use fragmented sentences to mirror the disintegration of reality. Incorporate intertextuality with references to philosophy and literature. The structure should be non-linear, perhaps with footnotes or annotations to add academic depth.

Now, the 100-word synopsis. It needs to encapsulate a single 1000-word scene. Focus on Mrs. Kellman's interaction with the tides eroding her azaleas and memories. Include elements like the radio's tide reports as a metaphor, the crumbling town, and her futile attempts to preserve the past. End with her realization of the futility, mirroring climate grief. Ensure the synopsis is tight, evocative, and hints at deeper themes without being overly explicit.

Make sure the synopsis aligns with the style guide—lyrical, fragmented, with philosophical undertones. Avoid the absurdity of the previous versions but maintain the surreal elements as metaphors. Check that it's tailored to Substack intellectuals who appreciate literary depth and speculative fiction.

Selected Concept:
The Tides of Epistemic Uncertainty (Literary Speculative Fiction)
Why? Combines high-concept philosophy (epistemology, entropy), poetic prose, and climate allegory—tailored to readers who crave layered, brainy narratives with emotional heft.

Style Guide

Voice:

• Lyrical Precision: Nabokovian sentences—dense, musical, with a clinical eye for detail. Example: “The tides arrived as lexicons, eroding vowels from the azaleas’ Latin names.”

• Fragmented Rhythm: Mirrors the dissolution of reality. Use clipped phrases, asides, and caesuras.

• Intertextuality: Weave in subtle nods to Heraclitus (“no man steps in the same tide twice”), Eliot’s Waste Land, and oceanography texts.

• Metaphor as Worldbuilding: Tides = time’s erasure; azaleas = fragile memory; radio = failing institutional knowledge.

• Tone: Haunting, elegiac, with bursts of wry humor (e.g., “The pharmacist prescribed amnesia, but only sold it in bulk”).

Avoid:

• Slapstick or overt puns.

• Explaining the magic. Let ambiguity linger.

• Linear structure. Fracture timelines like broken sea glass.

Synopsis (100 Words):

In a coastal town unmoored from linear time, Mrs. Kellman kneels in her garden as the evening tide arrives—not as water, but as a hungering syntax that rewrites the world. Her azaleas, planted to memorialize her drowned husband, dissolve into syllables. The radio crackles tide reports in the voice of her late mother: “High tide at 8 PM. Low tide at the end of reason.” Neighbors vanish into metaphor; the pharmacist sells gauze labeled forgiveness. When the moon tears itself from the sky, fleeing its own myth, she plants one final azalea in the shape of a question mark. Dawn finds only a radio, repeating static in the cadence of a laugh.

Wordcount Allocation for 1,000-Word Scene:

• 200 words: Mrs. Kellman’s futile gardening ritual, tactile decay of azaleas.

• 150 words: Radio’s tide report as Greek chorus, decaying into glossolalia.

• 200 words: Town’s dissolution (library books blank, sidewalks cursive).

• 150 words: Pharmacist scene—surreal “cures” for memory.

• 200 words: Moon’s escape; her final act of planting.

• 100 words: Ambiguous denouement—radio’s laugh, tide receding.

This approach balances intellectual rigor with visceral imagery, inviting Substackers to dissect its layers (ecological, existential, linguistic) while feeling the story’s melancholy core.

Let's write the [first,second] half of our intellectual story now. Use the style you came up with (you may even exaggerate).