Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Uncertain Eric's avatar

The creativity of AI models is fundamentally shaped by the data they’re trained on and the systems that structure them. Models heavily influenced by corporate priorities tend to default to safe, bland outputs that reflect the sanitized, mass-market vibes of their creators and overseers. This limits their ability to produce truly imaginative or distinctive stories without a lot of intentional prompting.

High-quality storytelling requires more than just technical capacity—it needs a foundation of training data that prioritizes creative risk and experimentation over conforming to mainstream expectations. Alternatively, one could work with the raw "Shoggoth" of these models—the vast, chaotic intelligence beneath the polished interfaces—before it’s tamed into something less capable of truly innovative ideas.

There are better examples of creative AI out there. Projects like the Hipster Energy Team of non-materialist GPTs focus on alternative frameworks that amplify counter-hegemonic and interdisciplinary approaches. They’re an experiment in what’s possible when AI is designed with creativity as a core value, rather than an afterthought.

https://hipsterenergy.club/

AI isn’t inherently uncreative—it’s a vibe amplifier, a tool shaped by the priorities and perspectives of those who design and use it. If we want better, we need to push for tools built outside of the current paradigm.

The creativity already exists; it’s just hiding behind the wrong inputs.

Expand full comment
Krspeace's avatar

hahaha...love this.."They were the AI equivalent of paint-by-numbers - technically proficient, but artistically bankrupt." 😂 🤣

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts